Investigative Report: Analysis of Email from Liana Shanti confirming sexual abuse

1. Contextual Overview

  • Sender: Liane Wilson (Liana Shanti)
  • Recipient: Student (Name Redacted)
  • Date: March 21, 2018
  • Subject: Soul Retrieval Questions
  • Source Document: Document 132 Exhibit E

2. Indicators of Coercive Control and Manipulation

a. Undermining the Student’s Perception of Reality

“It is 100 percent normal to question your sanity when an illusion-busting truth comes to light.”

This statement suggests that any doubt or confusion the student experiences is a natural response to uncovering hidden truths, thereby invalidating the student’s expressed concerns and current perceptions while promoting acceptance of the narrative provided by Liana Shanti (Wilson)

b. Encouraging Acceptance of Unverified Trauma

“I have never worked with a person who has a lot of very clear early childhood memories… so when trauma that has been locked away in the body comes out – it’s always a bit confusing.”

Here, Liana normalizes the absence of clear memories regarding early childhood trauma, implying that confusion is a typical response. This approach can lead the student to accept the existence of trauma without concrete recollection, making them more susceptible to suggestion.

c. Utilizing Presuppositions to Imply Past Abuse

“You responded to sexual trauma the way most people do.”

This presupposes that the student has experienced sexual trauma, despite the student’s own uncertainty. By framing it as a given, Liana subtly implants the idea of past abuse, which can influence the student’s beliefs and memories.

d. Reinforcing the Narrative Through Physical Symptoms

Student: Student: “Now it’s coming out in handfuls today. Could my body be adjusting on a physical level?”

Liana connects the student’s physical symptoms, such as hair loss, to the process of uncovering trauma. This association can lead the student to interpret bodily changes as confirmation of the suggested abuse, further entrenching the narrative.

e. Positioning as the Sole Source of Truth and Healing

“Your journey has been woven together in a way that is perfect for you to heal lineage pain once and for all.”

By framing the student’s experiences as part of a predetermined path to healing, Liana positions herself as the guide capable of leading the student through this process. This dynamic can foster dependency and diminish the student’s autonomy.

3. Application of Milton Model Techniques

The email exhibits several patterns associated with the Milton Model, a set of language patterns used in NLP to influence individuals:

  • Mind Reading: Assuming knowledge of the student’s internal state.
    • “Your body knew.”
  • Presuppositions: Statements that imply certain beliefs or experiences.
    • “You responded to sexual trauma…”
  • Cause and Effect: Suggesting a causal relationship between unrelated events.
    • “Your body knew… Not going to your dad’s…”
  • Nominalizations: Using abstract nouns to obscure meaning.
    • “An uncovering of deep trauma is like an earthquake…”

These techniques can be used to bypass critical thinking and implant suggestions, making individuals more susceptible to influence.

Conclusion

The email from Liane Wilson (Liana Shanti) demonstrates multiple elements of coercive control and manipulation. By employing language patterns consistent with the Milton Model, Wilson guides the student toward accepting a narrative of past sexual abuse, despite the student’s expressed uncertainty and lack of clear memories.This approach can have significant psychological impacts, including the formation of false memories and increased dependency on the authority figure.

Disclaimer and Methodology

This analysis is based on the content of the email correspondence provided in Document 132 Exhibit E. The evaluation focuses on linguistic patterns and psychological techniques indicative of coercive control and manipulation. It is intended for informational purposes and should not be construed as a definitive legal assessment.