Summary of Coercive Control Patterns – April 10, 2025
| Category | Frequency |
|---|---|
| Psychological Risk – High | 6 |
| Psychological Risk – Extreme | 2 |
| Psychological Risk – Moderate | 2 |
| Dominant Coercive Control Type | Thought Control / Emotional Manipulation |
| Posts Involving Implied Threat | 1 |
| Posts Involving Spiritual Mandate | 4 |
Exhibit 1 – 2025-04-10
Extracted Text: One teaching of His … is CALLING OUT EVIL. PUBLICLY. LOUDLY. CONSISTENTLY. Ephesians 5:11
Coercive Control Type: Thought Control, Behavioral Mandate, Spiritual Manipulation
Manipulation Techniques: Moral absolutism, Urgency, Religious weaponization
Psychological Risk Level: High
Legal Risk Flag: Defamation risk, Psychological harm, Unlicensed spiritual authority
Target Audience: Followers hesitant to engage in public confrontation or spiritual “activism”
Tone / Emotional Strategy: Assertive and militant; uses repetition and ALL CAPS to instill urgency
Known Pattern or Repetition: Mirrors previous commands to “speak boldly” across her other teachings
Cross-Reference Notes: Pairs with Exhibit 4 to reinforce duty-based behavior in public forums
Risk Escalation Context: First step in a sequence escalating from moral mandate to implied threat
Exhibit 2 – 2025-04-10
Extracted Text: Revelation 21:8 … being a coward and not calling out evil is a serious transgression.
Coercive Control Type: Emotional Manipulation, Spiritual Blackmail, Thought Reform
Manipulation Techniques: Fear of hellfire, Religious absolutism, Demonization
Psychological Risk Level: Extreme
Legal Risk Flag: Defamation, Spiritual abuse, Harassment encouragement
Target Audience: Those on the fence about speaking out publicly
Tone / Emotional Strategy: Spiritual intimidation using apocalyptic threat language
Known Pattern or Repetition: Use of Revelation quotes common in prior aggressive callout posts
Cross-Reference Notes: Reinforces Exhibit 1’s messaging with divine consequence
Risk Escalation Context: Escalates to fear of damnation if loyalty is questioned
Exhibit 3 – 2025-04-10
Extracted Text: You must follow ALL of Jesus’s teachings … or you’re not in the Light.
Coercive Control Type: Thought Control, Shame Induction, Spiritual Absolutism
Manipulation Techniques: Binary moral framing, Ego-shaming, Loaded imagery
Psychological Risk Level: High
Legal Risk Flag: Unlicensed religious counseling, Guilt induction
Target Audience: Followers uncertain about their worth or spiritual alignment
Tone / Emotional Strategy: Guilt-loaded directive framing
Known Pattern or Repetition: Consistent framing of “light vs dark” to classify obedience
Cross-Reference Notes: Builds on Exhibit 1’s urgency and moral obligation
Risk Escalation Context: Reinforces dichotomous thinking—followers are either chosen or cast out
Exhibit 4 – 2025-04-10
Extracted Text: Jesus teaches us to speak the truth boldly … Jesus COMMANDS it.
Coercive Control Type: Moral Absolutism, Emotional Pressure, Behavioral Control
Manipulation Techniques: Prescriptive language, Loyalty-based shaming
Psychological Risk Level: High
Legal Risk Flag: Public call-outs, Religious coercion
Target Audience: Followers who are passive, cautious, or conflict-avoidant
Tone / Emotional Strategy: Commanding, divine obligation
Known Pattern or Repetition: Consistent pattern of framing divine will as social enforcement
Cross-Reference Notes: Direct continuation of Exhibits 1 and 2
Risk Escalation Context: Escalates moral guidance to moral obligation
Exhibit 5 – 2025-04-10
Extracted Text: Feeling so good right now 🙏 Thank you JESUS
Coercive Control Type: Love Bombing, Emotional Anchoring, Spiritual Euphoria Conditioning
Manipulation Techniques: Joy linked to divine praise, Conditioning through sensory positivity
Psychological Risk Level: Moderate
Legal Risk Flag: Spiritual grooming potential
Target Audience: New or emotionally vulnerable followers seeking joy and meaning
Tone / Emotional Strategy: Euphoric affirmation, devotional sentimentality
Known Pattern or Repetition: Pattern of “emotional reward” after obedience
Cross-Reference Notes: Balances out fear-based posts with emotional anchoring
Risk Escalation Context: Rewards submission with joy to reinforce group bonding
Exhibit 6 – 2025-04-10
Extracted Text: Called out reiki … got Bible verses back from the reiki people 🙄
Coercive Control Type: Group Conformity, Us-vs-Them Framing, Shaming Dissent
Manipulation Techniques: Mockery, Peer reinforcement, Echo chamber logic
Psychological Risk Level: High
Legal Risk Flag: Religious harassment, Group incitement
Target Audience: Group members policing alternative beliefs
Tone / Emotional Strategy: Mocking sarcasm, social shaming
Known Pattern or Repetition: Frequently targets dissenters and “other” practices
Cross-Reference Notes: Reinforces inner group compliance with ridicule of outsiders
Risk Escalation Context: Moves from emotional threat to social mockery
Exhibit 7 – 2025-04-10
Extracted Text: LOSING EVERYTHING … now I know exactly who to bury.
Coercive Control Type: Implied Threat, Loyalty Conditioning, Violence-Laced Messaging
Manipulation Techniques: Violent implication, Framed as divine justice, Loyalty test
Psychological Risk Level: Extreme
Legal Risk Flag: Violence incitement, Abuse of telecommunications, Intimidation
Target Audience: Betrayers or dissenters being warned to remain loyal
Tone / Emotional Strategy: Menacing, revenge-based language framed as justice
Known Pattern or Repetition: Pattern of veiled threats against “evil” doers
Cross-Reference Notes: Contrast with Exhibit 5’s joy to highlight conditional emotional access
Risk Escalation Context: Climaxes the emotional trajectory of the day’s posts
Exhibit 8 – 2025-04-10
Extracted Text: Podcast: Releasing self-blame / guilt / shame … ‘She can have it all’
Coercive Control Type: Emotional Anchoring, False Empowerment, Therapy Mimicry
Manipulation Techniques: Healing claims without credentials, Emotional baiting
Psychological Risk Level: High
Legal Risk Flag: Misrepresentation of therapy, FTC risk
Target Audience: Women processing trauma or abandonment
Tone / Emotional Strategy: Soothing encouragement tied to product enrollment
Known Pattern or Repetition: Frequent in coaching-style recruitment posts
Cross-Reference Notes: Often follows more aggressive posts to soften perception
Risk Escalation Context: Uses reward framing after obedience or shame cycles
Exhibit 9 – 2025-04-10
Extracted Text: ‘Thank you for showing me the True Jesus’ … enrolled in HMI, LPM, etc.
Coercive Control Type: Devotional Submission, Identity Restructuring, Dependency Induction
Manipulation Techniques: Praise, Program stacking, Spiritual hierarchy
Psychological Risk Level: High
Legal Risk Flag: Unlicensed coaching, FTC testimonial disclosure, Medical/dietary claims
Target Audience: Recruits ready to commit emotionally or financially
Tone / Emotional Strategy: Gratitude wrapped in submission language
Known Pattern or Repetition: Used frequently after user onboarding
Cross-Reference Notes: Backlinks to Exhibits 3 and 8 (obedience + reward)
Risk Escalation Context: Marks internalization of influence and external validation
Exhibit 10 – 2025-04-10
Extracted Text: So much joy… 🥰 (dolphins swimming)
Coercive Control Type: Emotional Anchoring, Spiritual Priming, Disarmament Imagery
Manipulation Techniques: Symbolic emotional attachment, Euphoria visual insert
Psychological Risk Level: Moderate
Legal Risk Flag: No direct risk, part of broader emotional grooming pattern
Target Audience: Passive followers being primed for suggestibility
Tone / Emotional Strategy: Soft visual calm, sensory seduction
Known Pattern or Repetition: Used cyclically after aggression posts
Cross-Reference Notes: Follows Exhibit 7 to down-regulate tension
Risk Escalation Context: Disarms critical thinking via euphoria priming
This analysis was conducted using a hybrid forensic linguistics and psychological evaluation framework. Each Instagram post was assessed using recognized models of coercive control, including:
- The BITE Model of Authoritarian Control by Steven Hassan
- Robert Jay Lifton’s Eight Criteria for Thought Reform
- Milton Model patterns from Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP)
Posts were scored for psychological risk and reviewed for legal flags based on U.S. federal law, state licensing, and international ethics. This matrix is part of an ongoing public safety investigation and is not a replacement for legal or clinical diagnosis.