Quote 1 (Page 5, Line 6)
Quote: “I’m not a coach. I don’t advertise as a coach.”
NLP Pattern: Denial / Licensing Rebuttal
Psychological Effect: Attempts to preempt legal liability by denying professional identity
Risk Level:
Notes: Strategic distancing from roles that would subject her to licensing, regulation, or accountability under professional standards.
Quote 2 (Page 5, Line 7)
Quote: “I don’t give people direction. I don’t give them advice.”
NLP Pattern: Denial / Influence Disassociation
Psychological Effect: Minimizes perceived authority or influence over clients/followers
Risk Level:
Notes: Aims to avoid classification as a coach or unlicensed advisor, despite repeated patterns of follower dependency in other contexts.
Quote 3 (Page 5, Line 8)
Quote: “I listen. And I support. And I validate.”
NLP Pattern: Therapeutic Language Framing / Trance Rhythm
Psychological Effect: Builds trust and alignment by mirroring therapeutic rapport patterns
Risk Level:
Notes: The cadence and language emulate licensed therapy models, potentially misleading followers into believing they are receiving mental health support.
Quote 4 (Page 5, Line 9)
Quote: “And I do that for free. And that’s my role.”
NLP Pattern: Altruism / Role Framing
Psychological Effect: Establishes self as a benevolent figure immune to criticism
Risk Level:
Notes: Shifts the listener’s focus from legal or ethical scrutiny to gratitude or admiration; uses free services to sidestep accountability.
Quote 5 (Page 5, Line 10)
Quote: “But when a child is disclosing abuse, it’s not about me anymore.”
NLP Pattern: Deflection / Emotional Anchor
Psychological Effect: Shifts focus from personal responsibility to moral obligation
Risk Level:
Notes: Leverages the emotionally charged topic of child abuse to reposition herself as a protector, deflecting scrutiny of personal conduct.
Quote 6 (Page 5, Line 11)
Quote: “If they say they were abused, they have a right to say it.”
NLP Pattern: Speech Justification / Presupposition
Psychological Effect: Creates the assumption that all disclosures are valid and protected, bypassing evidence or legal process
Risk Level:
Notes: Reinforces the idea that belief equals truth, which may psychologically anchor followers into accepting claims without verification or due process.
Quote 7 (Page 5, Line 13)
Quote: “It’s not coaching. It’s not me telling them what to say.”
NLP Pattern: Denial / Influence Rebuttal
Psychological Effect: Preemptively negates accusations of scripting or manipulation
Risk Level:
Notes: The use of repetition and strong negation positions her as passive, even though other statements suggest a role in shaping narratives or behavior.
Quote 8 (Page 5, Line 15)
Quote: “My programs have nothing to do with that.”
NLP Pattern: Disassociation / Generalization
Psychological Effect: Creates distance between her actions/programs and negative consequences without specifying what “that” is
Risk Level:
Notes: This blanket denial avoids addressing any specific outcome, offering no proof or mechanism for how she remains uninvolved. A common liability evasion tactic.
Quote 9 (Page 5, Line 16)
Quote: “I’m qualified as a human being, as a Christian, to speak about evil.”
NLP Pattern: Identity Framing / Moral Authority
Psychological Effect: Positions herself as divinely or morally superior, discouraging disagreement
Risk Level:
Notes: Common in coercive environments — spiritual framing of qualification overrides rational accountability or professional standards.
Quote 10 (Page 5, Line 18)
Quote: “That is my spiritual path to believe in Jesus and to do prayer ceremonies and prayer vigils.”
NLP Pattern: Spiritual Framing / Rhetorical Shield
Psychological Effect: Wraps all public behavior in a religious frame, thereby elevating it above criticism or legal accountability
Risk Level:
Notes: This is a core cult-style rhetorical strategy — wrapping public speech in divine purpose while using it to influence or justify actions with potential real-world harm.
Quote 11 (Page 5, Line 19)
Quote: “This is my belief, and my belief is protected.”
NLP Pattern: First Amendment Shield / Belief Framing
Psychological Effect: Shields speaker from scrutiny by invoking constitutional protection over personal assertions
Risk Level:
Notes: This phrase suggests immunity from criticism or legal evaluation by equating belief with protected speech, even in the context of potentially harmful claims.
Quote 12 (Page 6, Line 2)
Quote: “I have proof of everything I’ve said.”
NLP Pattern: Universal Claim / Authority Assertion
Psychological Effect: Establishes presumed factual credibility without presenting evidence
Risk Level:
Notes: Broad, unverifiable claims like this can manipulate perception of legitimacy and silence challenges or scrutiny by projecting confidence and finality.
Quote 13 (Page 6, Line 4)
Quote: “When somebody is threatening the life of your child, what would you do?”
NLP Pattern: Emotional Appeal / Rhetorical Question
Psychological Effect: Bypasses logic and evidence to provoke protective, high-emotion reaction
Risk Level:
Notes: Frames herself as morally justified while shifting burden to the listener; a classic tactic in coercive justification of unverified claims or aggressive actions.
Quote 14 (Page 6, Line 6)
Quote: “I have never said to anyone, your child was abused by their father.”
NLP Pattern: Absolute Denial / Reinforced Rebuttal
Psychological Effect: Attempts to eliminate doubt by invoking categorical language
Risk Level:
Notes: The absolute phrasing (“never,” “anyone”) is commonly used to shut down critical inquiry, despite contradictions that may exist elsewhere in broader messaging.
Quote 15 (Page 6, Line 7)
Quote: “I never said that. Not one time.”
NLP Pattern: Repetition / Emotional Emphasis
Psychological Effect: Uses rhythm and repetition to amplify denial and embed memory
Risk Level:
Notes: Designed to emotionally reinforce her position while sounding final; a linguistic tactic used to signal sincerity, especially under legal threat.
Quote 16 (Page 6, Line 9)
Quote: “Because you all are trying to make me look like I am creating this. I’m not.”
NLP Pattern: Victim Reversal / Defensive Framing
Psychological Effect: Reframes scrutiny as unjust targeting, provoking defensive empathy
Risk Level:
Notes: Casts the speaker as persecuted, potentially derailing rational analysis or accountability. Uses “you all” to widen blame.
Quote 17 (Page 6, Line 11)
Quote: “And the truth is not popular. And when people tell the truth, they get hated for it.”
NLP Pattern: Martyr Narrative / Moral Framing
Psychological Effect: Suggests that opposition is proof of righteousness, discouraging critical inquiry
Risk Level:
Notes: Common in high-control groups, this framing elevates perceived victimhood into spiritual or moral superiority.
Quote 18 (Page 6, Line 13)
Quote: “I’m not a coach. I don’t advertise as a coach. (Repeated in transcript)”
NLP Pattern: Repetition / Role Denial
Psychological Effect: Reinforces disassociation from legal or professional accountability
Risk Level:
Notes: Repeating earlier denials may indicate strategic emphasis or a pattern of rehearsed distancing from regulatory scrutiny.
Quote 19 (Page 6, Line 14)
Quote: “I don’t give people direction. I don’t give them advice. (Repeated in transcript)”
NLP Pattern: Repetition / Influence Denial
Psychological Effect: Reinforces a passive, non-directive image to reduce liability
Risk Level:
Notes: Continued restatement of denial reflects a defensive legal posture, especially relevant in accusations of unlicensed therapy or undue influence.
Quote 20 (Page 6, Line 15)
Quote: “I listen. And I support. And I validate. (Repeated in transcript)”
NLP Pattern: Repetition / Therapeutic Language Framing
Psychological Effect: Mimics language used in licensed counseling to suggest safety and care, even when unqualified
Risk Level:
Notes: Repeated use of emotionally supportive terms may increase trust while masking lack of credentials. Carries moderate risk of misleading vulnerable individuals.
Quote 21 (Page 7, Line 2)
Quote: “This is what happens when you speak up. You get torn down.”
NLP Pattern: Martyr Narrative / Cause & Effect Framing
Psychological Effect: Reinforces the belief that criticism confirms righteousness
Risk Level:
Notes: Suggests persecution for speaking truth, which can cement in-group loyalty and resistance to opposing views. This pattern is common in high-control environments.
Quote 22 (Page 7, Line 4)
Quote: “I didn’t coach anyone. I didn’t manipulate anyone.”
NLP Pattern: Denial / Control Rebuttal
Psychological Effect: Directly rejects influence or intent while preempting legal interpretation
Risk Level:
Notes: This defensive structure is strategically placed to reject any suggestion of psychological control. Lacks evidence or acknowledgment of potential unintentional influence.
Quote 23 (Page 7, Line 6)
Quote: “What I do is listen. I provide a space for healing.”
NLP Pattern: Therapeutic Framing / Rapport Building
Psychological Effect: Presents self as a safe, supportive figure while avoiding regulatory responsibility
Risk Level:
Notes: Uses the language of counseling or therapy without a license, which may blur boundaries for followers seeking help.
Quote 24 (Page 7, Line 7)
Quote: “They come to me because they feel unseen and unheard.”
NLP Pattern: Savior Framing / Emotional Appeal
Psychological Effect: Establishes herself as the sole source of validation and safety for vulnerable individuals
Risk Level:
Notes: Creates emotional dependency by highlighting followers’ pain and presenting herself as their only sanctuary. Key trait in charismatic control systems.
Quote 25 (Page 7, Line 9)
Quote: “They don’t feel safe in the system.”
NLP Pattern: System Mistrust / Isolation Tactic
Psychological Effect: Undermines external structures and aligns loyalty with the speaker
Risk Level:
Notes: Isolating followers from “the system” is a hallmark of coercive dynamics. This primes distrust of authorities while increasing reliance on the leader.
Quote 21 (Page 7, Line 2)
Quote: “This is what happens when you speak up. You get torn down.”
NLP Pattern: Martyr Narrative / Cause & Effect Framing
Psychological Effect: Reinforces the belief that criticism confirms righteousness
Risk Level:
Notes: Suggests persecution for speaking truth, which can cement in-group loyalty and resistance to opposing views. This pattern is common in high-control environments.
Quote 22 (Page 7, Line 4)
Quote: “I didn’t coach anyone. I didn’t manipulate anyone.”
NLP Pattern: Denial / Control Rebuttal
Psychological Effect: Directly rejects influence or intent while preempting legal interpretation
Risk Level:
Notes: This defensive structure is strategically placed to reject any suggestion of psychological control. Lacks evidence or acknowledgment of potential unintentional influence.
Quote 23 (Page 7, Line 6)
Quote: “What I do is listen. I provide a space for healing.”
NLP Pattern: Therapeutic Framing / Rapport Building
Psychological Effect: Presents self as a safe, supportive figure while avoiding regulatory responsibility
Risk Level:
Notes: Uses the language of counseling or therapy without a license, which may blur boundaries for followers seeking help.
Quote 24 (Page 7, Line 7)
Quote: “They come to me because they feel unseen and unheard.”
NLP Pattern: Savior Framing / Emotional Appeal
Psychological Effect: Establishes herself as the sole source of validation and safety for vulnerable individuals
Risk Level:
Notes: Creates emotional dependency by highlighting followers’ pain and presenting herself as their only sanctuary. Key trait in charismatic control systems.
Quote 25 (Page 7, Line 9)
Quote: “They don’t feel safe in the system.”
NLP Pattern: System Mistrust / Isolation Tactic
Psychological Effect: Undermines external structures and aligns loyalty with the speaker
Risk Level:
Notes: Isolating followers from “the system” is a hallmark of coercive dynamics. This primes distrust of authorities while increasing reliance on the leader.
Quote 31 (Page 8, Line 6)
Quote: “I’m being punished for creating a space for truth.”
NLP Pattern: Martyr Framing / Group Loyalty
Psychological Effect: Converts personal scrutiny into collective injustice, rallying group solidarity
Risk Level:
Notes: A common control technique in charismatic leadership: reframing accountability as persecution, reinforcing follower loyalty and polarizing the group from external reality.
Quote 32 (Page 8, Line 8)
Quote: “If you silence me, you silence them.”
NLP Pattern: Group Fusion / Moral Threat
Psychological Effect: Links speaker’s identity with the group’s voice, making criticism appear harmful to many
Risk Level:
Notes: Elevates self to the voice of the group. This is a coercive defense tactic that implies silencing one leader will oppress an entire class of victims.
Quote 33 (Page 8, Line 10)
Quote: “I was chosen to do this work. It’s sacred.”
NLP Pattern: Spiritual Identity Claim / Divine Mandate
Psychological Effect: Frames her authority as spiritually ordained, not subject to conventional logic or criticism
Risk Level:
Notes: Strong cult indicator — uses spiritual selection to legitimize power and resist external accountability. Creates mythic status among followers.
Quote 34 (Page 8, Line 12)
Quote: “This is a calling, not a career.”
NLP Pattern: Sacred Science / Altruistic Reframing
Psychological Effect: Positions speaker’s role as moral/spiritual duty, minimizing responsibility for harm
Risk Level:
Notes: This rhetorical device absolves the speaker from economic or organizational accountability while implying divine purpose and moral elevation.
Quote 35 (Page 8, Line 13)
Quote: “You can’t take that away from me.”
NLP Pattern: Possessive Rhetoric / Identity Defense
Psychological Effect: Emotional defense of status and control, framed as personal and inviolable
Risk Level:
Notes: While vague, this statement uses personal possessiveness to suggest moral right and resistance to outside intervention. Can escalate defiance in high-control settings.
Quote 36 (Page 8, Line 15)
Quote: “Every woman I’ve worked with has her own truth.”
NLP Pattern: Milton Model / Subjectivism
Psychological Effect: Shifts truth from objective standard to personal perspective, which can shield false claims from scrutiny
Risk Level:
Notes: Subjectivism is a common tool in manipulative environments where internal feelings override facts, especially when used to validate allegations or reframe memory.
Quote 37 (Page 9, Line 2)
Quote: “If you listen long enough, you’ll hear the patterns.”
NLP Pattern: Presupposition / Pattern Framing
Psychological Effect: Implies that truth is self-evident and emergent, pressuring agreement over time
Risk Level:
Notes: Encourages confirmation bias by suggesting that repeated exposure leads to realization. This is often used in indoctrination to align belief with message repetition.
Quote 38 (Page 9, Line 4)
Quote: “They are not lying. Not one of them.”
NLP Pattern: Absolute Truth Assertion / Global Generalization
Psychological Effect: Dismisses the possibility of error, contradiction, or complexity among group narratives
Risk Level:
Notes: A blanket assertion that defends all group claims from skepticism. This “all or nothing” framing can pressure others to conform and suppress doubt.
Quote 39 (Page 9, Line 6)
Quote: “I would never put words in their mouth.”
NLP Pattern: Denial / Influence Rebuttal
Psychological Effect: Preemptively defends against suggestions of narrative coaching or suggestion
Risk Level:
Notes: Disclaims manipulation while inviting trust. However, context and emotional influence may still guide outcomes without direct scripting.
Quote 40 (Page 9, Line 8)
Quote: “They found the courage. I just held space.”
NLP Pattern: Therapeutic Framing / Deflection
Psychological Effect: Minimizes personal influence while subtly reinforcing centrality in the healing process
Risk Level:
Notes: Strategic self-minimization paired with therapeutic language. Can obscure indirect suggestion or responsibility while maintaining emotional leadership.
Quote 41 (Page 24, Line 6)
Quote: “Is it — I have a panic disorder and claustrophobia. Is it okay if I lower the mask to speak, Your Honor?”
NLP Pattern: Medical Disclosure / Accessibility
Psychological Effect: Requests accommodation while framing herself as vulnerable or medically constrained
Risk Level:
Notes: May be used to humanize speaker or create empathy before delivering emotionally charged statements.
Quote 42 (Page 24, Line 9)
Quote: “The man who is the father of this child, his name is B.H, and he has made multiple death threats to my family.”
NLP Pattern: Allegation / Threat Framing
Psychological Effect: Frames herself and family as victims of violence, elevating emotional stakes
Risk Level:
Notes: Serious accusation stated without evidence; may legally qualify as defamation if unsubstantiated.
Quote 43 (Page 24, Line 11)
Quote: “He called my husband, my ex-husband, who’s also in the courtroom, threatening to kill my children when the abuse of his daughter was disclosed on my page.”
NLP Pattern: Allegation / Victim Framing
Psychological Effect: Amplifies perceived danger and ties online content to real-world threat
Risk Level:
Notes: Highly inflammatory statement that may shape judicial perception if not fact-checked.
Quote 44 (Page 24, Line 13)
Quote: “I’m an advocate for victim’s rights.”
NLP Pattern: Self-Labeling / Authority Claim
Psychological Effect: Asserts moral alignment with victims, positioning self as protector
Risk Level:
Notes: Reinforces group identity and credibility; common positioning in cultic or coercive leadership.
Quote 45 (Page 24, Line 14)
Quote: “The mother, H.W, has videos, which I also have, of the child before she was working with me, before I even knew Hxxxx existed…”
NLP Pattern: Evidence Claim / Timeline Framing
Psychological Effect: Attempts to establish credibility and reduce perceived influence
Risk Level:
Notes: Shifts burden of origin to outside sources, preemptively dismissing coaching concerns.
Quote 46 (Page 24, Line 16)
Quote: “This child describing extreme sexual abuse and extreme physical abuse, being headlocked, being locked in her bedroom, having to pee on her bedroom floor.”
NLP Pattern: Graphic Disclosure / Trauma Narrative
Psychological Effect: Provokes shock and emotional urgency, overriding critical thinking
Risk Level:
Notes: Vivid trauma descriptions create psychological anchoring and may be used manipulatively in influence settings.
Quote 47 (Page 24, Line 18)
Quote: “And her mother tried to have the child removed, and CPS has investigated.”
NLP Pattern: Agency Involvement Claim
Psychological Effect: Adds credibility by referencing institutional action
Risk Level:
Notes: Cites CPS without detail; vague references can be persuasive even without documentation.
Quote 48 (Page 24, Line 20)
Quote: “I don’t know if you’re aware of this, there’s huge legislation Joe Biden just signed in March to educate Family Court judges…”
NLP Pattern: Legislation Appeal / Authority Reference
Psychological Effect: Invokes federal action to validate personal stance
Risk Level:
Notes: Federal name-dropping can influence judicial perception, even if the reference is loosely connected.
Quote 49 (Page 25, Line 1)
Quote: “…they’re only prosecuting 19 percent of cases where children come forward about sexual abuse.”
NLP Pattern: Statistic Usage / Emotional Framing
Psychological Effect: Uses numeric shock to provoke moral urgency
Risk Level:
Notes: Emotional framing of statistics often bypasses fact-checking and heightens outrage.
Quote 50 (Page 25, Line 3)
Quote: “And in those cases where mothers come forward, 78 percent of those children are taken from their mothers.”
NLP Pattern: Statistic Usage / Advocacy Rhetoric
Psychological Effect: Portrays systemic injustice and mobilizes protective sentiment
Risk Level:
Notes: Statistic lacks citation; exaggeration can distort reality in high-conflict custody narratives.
Quote 51 (Page 25, Line 5)
Quote: “Many are sent to what’s called reunification camps based on a theory called alienate — parental alienation…”
NLP Pattern: Criticism of Practice / Emotional Hook
Psychological Effect: Suggests harm through emotionally charged labeling of legal practices
Risk Level:
Notes: Language designed to evoke concern or disgust, which may manipulate opinion without full context.
Quote 52 (Page 25, Line 7)
Quote: “…which the American Psychological Association has completely debunked, and it was invented by an admitted pedophile…”
NLP Pattern: Delegitimization / Psychological Weaponization
Psychological Effect: Undermines scientific or legal credibility with ad hominem associations
Risk Level:
Notes: The tactic of citing a source’s moral failure to reject an entire concept is powerful but risky without corroborated data.
Quote 53 (Page 25, Line 9)
Quote: “…a man named Richard Gardner, who created and then committed suicide because he was found out for abusing over 500 children.” (FALSE STATEMENT)
NLP Pattern: Ad Hominem / Authority Undermining
Psychological Effect: Destroys credibility of a theory through alleged personal moral collapse
Risk Level:
Notes: Highly inflammatory and unverifiable statement; potential for defamation or disinformation.
Quote 54 (Page 25, Line 11)
Quote: “So now these abusive fathers and fathers who have been accused of abuse use it as a tool to abuse the court system and take these children away from their mothers.”
NLP Pattern: System Critique / Generalization
Psychological Effect: Promotes distrust of courts while casting opposition as systemic abusers
Risk Level:
Notes: Generalized language with high emotional charge; may rally followers while undermining public trust in judiciary.
Quote 55 (Page 25, Line 13)
Quote: “There’s federal legislation and also other — that’s specifically to educate judges and court professionals…”
NLP Pattern: Policy Justification / Advocacy Framing
Psychological Effect: Uses reform rhetoric to validate speaker’s platform
Risk Level:
Notes: Invokes unnamed policies to support credibility; contextually vague yet persuasive.
Quote 56 (Page 25, Line 16)
Quote: “B.H — I have always been an advocate for women’s rights and victim’s rights.”
NLP Pattern: Repetition / Self-Branding
Psychological Effect: Reframes personal role with high-empathy identifiers
Risk Level:
Notes: Builds identity as moral actor to counter claims of harm or impropriety.
Quote 57 (Page 25, Line 18)
Quote: “This has nothing to do with my money.”
NLP Pattern: Financial Disassociation
Psychological Effect: Preemptively denies financial motive to discredit criticism
Risk Level:
Notes: Implies altruism; commonly used tactic when personal gain may be questioned.
Quote 58 (Page 25, Line 19)
Quote: “A hundred percent of my money comes from programs that I sell.”
NLP Pattern: Monetization Framing
Psychological Effect: Attempts transparency while framing earnings as value-based
Risk Level:
Notes: Suggests independence from donations or unethical monetization; lowers risk perception.
Quote 59 (Page 25, Line 20)
Quote: “I do not take a penny.”
NLP Pattern: Financial Purity Assertion
Psychological Effect: Reinforces altruistic identity and shields against exploitation claims
Risk Level:
Notes: Absolutist phrasing implies incorruptibility but may contradict monetized course sales or income sources.
Quote 60 (Page 25, Line 21)
Quote: “I will give you every list of every person, every client. I have 15,000 active.”
NLP Pattern: Transparency Claim / Scale Appeal
Psychological Effect: Uses size of audience and openness to build legitimacy and authority
Risk Level:
Notes: Suggests cooperation and scale to impress credibility, though specific verifiability is lacking.
Quote 61 (Page 26, Line 2)
Quote: “They’ve done nothing but try to destroy me.”
NLP Pattern: Persecution Claim
Psychological Effect: Positions speaker as victim of targeted attacks, evoking defensive empathy
Risk Level:
Notes: Absolutist phrasing reinforces martyr identity and discourages scrutiny of underlying facts.
Quote 62 (Page 26, Line 3)
Quote: “And this is after receiving death threats for two and a half years.”
NLP Pattern: Threat Framing
Psychological Effect: Escalates sense of danger and justifies defensive actions or rhetoric
Risk Level:
Notes: Repeated threat narratives can shift focus from factual accountability to emotional protectionism.
Quote 63 (Page 26, Line 4)
Quote: “I’ve had to move my son multiple times.”
NLP Pattern: Family Safety Assertion
Psychological Effect: Builds urgency and portrays speaker as protective and endangered
Risk Level:
Notes: Frames legal matters as survival actions; emotionally persuasive regardless of factual context.
Quote 64 (Page 26, Line 5)
Quote: “We’ve had to get rid of everything that has our address on it.”
NLP Pattern: Security Narrative
Psychological Effect: Adds weight to threat claims and fuels perception of systemic targeting
Risk Level:
Notes: Suggests extreme precautions that may or may not be grounded in demonstrable risk.
Quote 65 (Page 26, Line 6)
Quote: “They tried to kill my son. They threatened to kill him.”
NLP Pattern: Extreme Threat Allegation
Psychological Effect: Provokes immediate protective reactions; bypasses evidence-based evaluation
Risk Level:
Notes: Serious accusation made in broad terms; high emotional risk and legal implications if unsubstantiated.
Quote 66 (Page 26, Line 8)
Quote: “These are women who have experienced trauma. They are doing their best.”
NLP Pattern: Group Defense
Psychological Effect: Humanizes group members and deflects criticism through compassion
Risk Level:
Notes: Often used to reframe group accountability as therapeutic support.
Quote 67 (Page 26, Line 10)
Quote: “They’re not a danger to the public. They’re not trying to hurt anybody.”
NLP Pattern: Follower Defense / Harmlessness Claim
Psychological Effect: Reduces perceived risk of followers’ behavior; appeals to reasonableness
Risk Level:
Notes: Preemptive rebuttal to legal or social allegations about follower conduct.
Quote 68 (Page 26, Line 11)
Quote: “They just wanted someone to listen to them.”
NLP Pattern: Validation / Support Framing
Psychological Effect: Softens perception of interactions; paints speaker as empathetic ear
Risk Level:
Notes: Reinforces “safe space” narrative; may minimize the nature of control or advice given.
Quote 69 (Page 26, Line 13)
Quote: “And those women were only in my groups for support.”
NLP Pattern: Scope Minimization
Psychological Effect: Downplays influence and legal liability by restricting role to non-directive function
Risk Level:
Notes: Contrasts with prior claims about audience size and involvement in personal programs.
Quote 70 (Page 26, Line 15)
Quote: “Some of them don’t even pay anything. It’s just a free group.”
NLP Pattern: Financial Deflection
Psychological Effect: Suggests generosity and altruism, redirecting focus from monetization concerns
Risk Level:
Notes: Used to disarm criticisms of exploitation or financial coercion in group dynamics.
Quote 71 (Page 26, Line 17)
Quote: “They just wanted support because their children were hurting.”
NLP Pattern: Emotional Justification
Psychological Effect: Reframes involvement as emotional caregiving rather than directive behavior
Risk Level:
Notes: Repositions group participation as driven by shared pain and care, not ideology or leadership.
Quote 72 (Page 26, Line 18)
Quote: “They were never coached. I never told them what to do.”
NLP Pattern: Influence Denial
Psychological Effect: Rejects control or manipulation accusations by framing role as passive
Risk Level:
Notes: Absolute negation is a common legal strategy in response to coaching allegations.
Quote 73 (Page 27, Line 2)
Quote: “I never said take your children. I never said leave your husband.”
NLP Pattern: Behavioral Denial
Psychological Effect: Distance from follower decisions by disavowing directive language
Risk Level:
Notes: Focuses on verbal precision to avoid accountability for implied or emotional influence.
Quote 74 (Page 27, Line 4)
Quote: “There is no evidence to support that I did.”
NLP Pattern: Burden of Proof Defense
Psychological Effect: Attempts to invalidate accusations through legalistic framing
Risk Level:
Notes: Focuses on absence of hard proof; does not address indirect, emotional, or suggestive influence mechanisms.
Quote 75 (Page 27, Line 6)
Quote: “I’ve never received a restraining order in my life.”
NLP Pattern: Reputation Defense
Psychological Effect: Presents clean legal history to cast doubt on recent allegations
Risk Level:
Notes: Common tactic to restore personal credibility in a legal setting.
Quote 76 (Page 27, Line 7)
Quote: “I’ve never had a felony in my life until this happened.”
NLP Pattern: Clean Record Assertion
Psychological Effect: Frames current conviction as anomaly, reinforcing personal innocence
Risk Level:
Notes: Encourages listener to view conviction as out-of-character or politically motivated.
Quote 77 (Page 27, Line 8)
Quote: “And even then, I pled because I had no other choice.”
NLP Pattern: Plea Justification
Psychological Effect: Deflects responsibility for legal outcome and reinforces victimhood
Risk Level:
Notes: Attempts to mitigate perception of guilt; may be persuasive to followers or sympathetic observers.
Quote 78 (Page 27, Line 9)
Quote: “I could not pay for a federal defense attorney.”
NLP Pattern: Financial Barrier Claim
Psychological Effect: Frames legal outcome as influenced by economic inequality
Risk Level:
Notes: Part of a broader narrative portraying the speaker as disadvantaged and targeted.
Quote 79 (Page 27, Line 11)
Quote: “All of those letters that you received, they were not honest.”
NLP Pattern: False Evidence Allegation
Psychological Effect: Undermines legitimacy of opposing testimony or advocacy
Risk Level:
Notes: Direct attack on credibility of court submissions; potential legal and ethical consequences.
Quote 80 (Page 27, Line 13)
Quote: “They were not people that are in my programs.”
NLP Pattern: Credibility Attack / Outsider Framing
Psychological Effect: Attempts to discredit critics by separating them from in-group participants
Risk Level:
Notes: Suggests that only “real” program members are qualified to offer testimony, creating a controlled narrative bubble.
Quote 81 (Page 27, Line 27)
Quote: “So, Bxxxx is the father being accused by the little girl, not by me.”
NLP Pattern: Deflection / Third-Party Attribution
Psychological Effect: Shifts responsibility for accusations to a child, distancing herself from liability
Risk Level:
Notes: Strategic distancing tactic used to deny personal accountability while maintaining narrative.
Quote 82 (Page 27, Line 28)
Quote: “I was a former attorney, Your Honor. I know the difference between making a statement my own self and saying that something is true when I don’t know it’s true.”
NLP Pattern: Legal Positioning / Authority Claim
Psychological Effect: Invokes legal credibility to validate distinction between fact and belief
Risk Level:
Notes: Asserts professional knowledge to protect against potential accusations of defamation.
Quote 83 (Page 27, Line 29)
Quote: “Do I believe Ixxx? Yes, I believe Ixxx.”
NLP Pattern: Belief Declaration
Psychological Effect: Asserts personal faith in testimony while evading direct responsibility for its content
Risk Level:
Notes: Creates space to support a narrative without legal accountability for its veracity.
Quote 84 (Page 27, Line 30)
Quote: “This little seven-year-old girl with a heart defect who’s had three open-heart surgeries and is subjected to this abuse. I believe her.”
NLP Pattern: Emotional Appeal / Victim Framing
Psychological Effect: Amplifies emotional weight of narrative to generate sympathy and moral alignment
Risk Level:
Notes: This tactic prioritizes emotion over evidence, a hallmark of persuasive but manipulative influence.
Quote 85 (Page 27, Line 31)
Quote: “And you know why I believe her? Because I’ve read the research.”
NLP Pattern: Justification / Academic Claim
Psychological Effect: Adds intellectual authority to emotional claims, strengthening their credibility
Risk Level:
Notes: Citing research without specifics introduces the illusion of authority while avoiding fact-based scrutiny.
Quote 86 (Page 27, Line 32)
Quote: “I’m currently in a doctorate program for psychology because I want to understand even more why are children not believed.” (Online Diplomia)
NLP Pattern: Credential Claim / Advocacy Framing
Psychological Effect: Establishes authority and purpose while reinforcing speaker’s moral mission
Risk Level:
Notes: Academic affiliation used to justify advocacy and solidify persuasive identity.
Quote 87 (Page 27, Line 33)
Quote: “The reason that less than 20 percent of these cases are prosecuted is because of evidence.”
NLP Pattern: System Critique / Statistic Usage
Psychological Effect: Suggests structural failure and legal neglect, implying moral urgency
Risk Level:
Notes: No citation given; assumes general truth to justify speaker’s broader narrative of injustice.
Quote 88 (Page 27, Line 34)
Quote: “Sorry. It’s my panic disorder.”
NLP Pattern: Medical Disclosure
Psychological Effect: Elicits sympathy and potentially excuses any emotional tone or behavior in court
Risk Level:
Notes: May serve to humanize speaker or explain heightened emotional affect.
Quote 89 (Page 28, Line 1)
Quote: “Children change their story, then children get scared. They’re worried about if they’re going to be taken, even from an abuser.”
NLP Pattern: Psychological Framing / Defense of Victim
Psychological Effect: Preemptively explains inconsistency in child narratives as a symptom of trauma
Risk Level:
Notes: Frames conflicting testimony as protective behavior, discouraging doubt or questioning.
Quote 90 (Page 28, Line 2)
Quote: “There is mountains of psychology research on this.”
NLP Pattern: Scientific Justification
Psychological Effect: Suggests broad academic consensus to silence critique or skepticism
Risk Level:
Notes: No source provided. Uses presumed authority of science without specifics to bolster emotional claims.
Quote 91 (Page 28, Line 3)
Quote: “President Biden just signed in Kayden’s Law in March to educate judges and to educate prosecutors and to educate guardian ad litems.”
NLP Pattern: Appeal to Legislation / Authority
Psychological Effect: Aligns her advocacy with federal authority to legitimize her position and disarm criticism
Risk Level:
Notes: Refers to real legislation to gain credibility, though interpretation or relevance may be distorted.
Quote 92 (Page 29, Line 2)
Quote: “My advocacy has hurt my income.”
NLP Pattern: Martyr Framing / Financial Justification
Psychological Effect: Portrays sacrifice for cause, enhancing moral high ground and deflecting profit motives
Risk Level:
Notes: Strategic victim framing that reinforces narrative of persecution for truth-telling.
Quote 93 (Page 29, Line 3)
Quote: “I have a nutrition school. I have programs where I teach people abundance and how to make money online.”
NLP Pattern: Program Defense / Income Disclosure
Psychological Effect: Attempts transparency about monetization while reframing as empowerment, not exploitation
Risk Level:
Notes: Often used to minimize accusations of cult-like financial dependency.
Quote 94 (Page 29, Line 5)
Quote: “Everybody who knows me, they’re like, Why are you doing this advocacy stuff? Look at where it landed me now.”
NLP Pattern: Reputation Reflection / Regret Framing
Psychological Effect: Signals sacrifice and suggests validation from inner circle, reinforcing moral intent
Risk Level:
Notes: Projects conflict between personal well-being and public service to elevate perceived selflessness.
Quote 95 (Page 29, Line 7)
Quote: “These people submitted false letters to you.”
NLP Pattern: Accusation / Evidence Rebuttal
Psychological Effect: Attempts to discredit opposition by asserting fabrication and manipulation of testimony
Risk Level:
Notes: Serious legal claim made without evidence in court setting; potential liability if unsubstantiated.
Quote 96 (Page 29, Line 8)
Quote: “I have 15,000 active students, 126,000 followers.”
NLP Pattern: Scale Defense / Influence Claim
Psychological Effect: Uses large audience to validate authority and reduce credibility of critics
Risk Level:
Notes: High follower count often cited as proof of legitimacy; can be used manipulatively to silence dissent.
Quote 97 (Page 29, Line 10)
Quote: “These 97 pages of material you got from 21 people relate to nine people.”
NLP Pattern: Rebuttal of Scope / Minimization Strategy
Psychological Effect: Reduces perceived weight of evidence by focusing on numerical scope and redundancy
Risk Level:
Notes: Attempts to deflate impact of opposing evidence by reframing it as narrow or exaggerated.
Quote 98 (Page 30, Line 1)
Quote: “It’s not my students. It’s all ex-husbands.”
NLP Pattern: Attribution Shift / Targeted Blame
Psychological Effect: Frames accusers as personally biased and external to core community
Risk Level:
Notes: Common deflection in high-control groups; outsider-blame reinforces in-group solidarity.
Quote 99 (Page 30, Line 3)
Quote: “One is going to actually be in Kapolei Family Court tomorrow, Lisa Fioirvante…”
NLP Pattern: Named Example / Court Tie-In
Psychological Effect: Adds specific anecdotal reference to bolster narrative and signal credibility
Risk Level:
Notes: Naming individuals in legal context may raise defamation and privacy concerns if unverified.
Quote 100 (Page 30, Line 6)
Quote: “Nine of my students, their ex-husbands and one father.”
NLP Pattern: Repetition / Reframing Accusers
Psychological Effect: Reinforces earlier blame-shift and redefines conflict as external vendetta
Risk Level:
Notes: Cumulative repetition used to solidify alternate causal narrative in court setting.
Quote 101 (Page 31, Line 25)
Quote: “She has videos—”
NLP Pattern: Evidence Reference
Psychological Effect: Signals existence of proof without presenting it, evoking credibility
Risk Level:
Notes: Implies legitimacy via referenced media, yet lacks detail or sourcing within the quote.
Quote 102 (Page 31, Line 27)
Quote: “Oh, sorry.”
NLP Pattern: Courtroom Interruption / Apology
Psychological Effect: Softens tone and reduces perceived aggression or challenge to authority
Risk Level:
Notes: Likely a brief reset in tone; carries no argumentative value but contributes to courtroom demeanor.
Quote 103 (Page 31, Line 30)
Quote: “No, sorry.”
NLP Pattern: Denial / Clarification
Psychological Effect: Asserts correction without confrontation; retains polite posture
Risk Level:
Notes: Continues tone of polite disagreement; no substantial content here, but contributes to courtroom image management.
Quote 104 (Page 31, Line 32)
Quote: “No, Your Honor.”
NLP Pattern: Respectful Disagreement
Psychological Effect: Maintains deference while disagreeing with authority, softening tension
Risk Level:
Notes: Polite resistance; contributes to strategic image of composed, respectful speaker.
Quote 105 (Page 31, Line 39)
Quote: “No, okay, I guess I misspoke. I’m not a criminal—I never did any criminal law, so I misused that word.”
NLP Pattern: Correction / Legal Role Framing
Psychological Effect: Reasserts intellectual honesty while downplaying misstatement
Risk Level:
Notes: Reframes mistake as semantic, not substantive; emphasizes professional past while distancing from “criminal” terminology.
Quote 107 (Page 32, Line 3)
Quote: “There’s nobody has seen—the act itself is not on camera.”
NLP Pattern: Evidence Limitation
Psychological Effect: Acknowledges lack of visual proof while maintaining claim validity
Risk Level:
Notes: Balances emotional testimony with acknowledgment of legal threshold gaps.
Quote 108 (Page 32, Line 6)
Quote: “Maybe that’s why Hxxxx can’t get a criminal thing going because she doesn’t have what would be considered evidence.”
NLP Pattern: Speculative Reasoning
Psychological Effect: Plants rationale for system failure while minimizing speaker’s own role
Risk Level:
Notes: Uses supposition to deflect attention from more critical questions around influence or involvement.
Quote 109 (Page 33, Line 1)
Quote: “Your Honor, I don’t get involved ever, I don’t induce anything. That is a claim they’re making because they don’t want the truth coming out.”
NLP Pattern: Denial / Conspiracy Framing
Psychological Effect: Refutes allegations while painting opposition as motivated by concealment
Risk Level:
Notes: Typical of high-control rhetoric — distances self from responsibility while invoking hidden enemies or truth suppression.
Quote 110 (Page 33, Line 3)
Quote: “I don’t—if they had any evidence that I do this, they—I’ve been online for 12 years. They know I don’t do this.”
NLP Pattern: Reputation Defense
Psychological Effect: Uses longevity and perceived transparency as proof of innocence
Risk Level:
Notes: Equating online visibility with innocence overlooks possibility of concealed influence.
Quote 111 (Page 33, Line 5)
Quote: “They put this on their social media and said, Let’s get her, let’s take her down, we gotta stop her talking.”
NLP Pattern: Targeted Harassment Allegation
Psychological Effect: Frames herself as the victim of an orchestrated online attack, evoking defensive sympathy
Risk Level:
Notes: Heightens emotional stakes while discrediting critics; suggests coordinated suppression of truth.
Quote 112 (Page 33, Line 7)
Quote: “They started harassing Probation for the purpose of abusing this Court to try to get me to stop sharing factual information.”
NLP Pattern: Court Manipulation Claim
Psychological Effect: Casts legal process as weaponized by enemies, undermining institutional authority
Risk Level:
Notes: Serious claim of judicial abuse without evidence; reinforces adversarial mindset.
Quote 113 (Page 33, Line 9)
Quote: “I don’t make any accusations. I’m sharing the videos.”
NLP Pattern: Scope Limitation / Rebuttal
Psychological Effect: Disclaims personal responsibility while maintaining ability to influence through indirect means
Risk Level:
Notes: Denies authorship of claims while platforming them — a frequent deflection tactic.
Quote 114 (Page 33, Line 11)
Quote: “This child that disclosed sexual and physical abuse against B.H before she even knew that I existed.”
NLP Pattern: Timing Defense / Disassociation
Psychological Effect: Establishes narrative independence; preempts grooming or coaching accusations
Risk Level:
Notes: Attempts to anchor credibility of testimony outside of speaker’s influence.
Quote 115 (Page 33, Line 14)
Quote: “Whatever those videos are, they show a little girl talking about being violated by an adult male who’s 6 foot 5.”
NLP Pattern: Graphic Testimonial Claim
Psychological Effect: Provokes visceral emotional response; establishes threat through size/emphasis
Risk Level:
Notes: Heightens drama and evokes protective instincts in listeners; lacks evidentiary neutrality.
Quote 116 (Page 33, Line 15)
Quote: “They show a little girl talking about being put into a headlock.”
NLP Pattern: Graphic Testimonial Detail
Psychological Effect: Vivid language designed to elicit emotional horror and belief
Risk Level:
Notes: Detailed descriptions heighten credibility in court and public opinion but risk prejudicing proceedings.
Quote 117 (Page 33, Line 16)
Quote: “A little girl talking about that daddy locked me in a bedroom for hours and I had to pee on the floor…”
NLP Pattern: Abuse Detail / Emotional Appeal
Psychological Effect: Uses extreme imagery to provoke sympathy and moral outrage
Risk Level:
Notes: High emotional charge may override legal objectivity; manipulative when unsupported.
Quote 118 (Page 34, Line 2)
Quote: “I just feel that that’s not in—I just chose not to.”
NLP Pattern: Discretion Defense
Psychological Effect: Asserts agency and moral high ground in avoiding escalation or further claims
Risk Level:
Notes: Frames non-action as principled restraint rather than omission or avoidance.
Quote 119 (Page 34, Line 7)
Quote: “They’re putting her under psychiatric care with medication, which is according to every person I’ve interviewed in the psychology field, this is another tactic of abusers.”
NLP Pattern: Medical Mistrust / Psychological Appeal
Psychological Effect: Sows doubt about psychiatric intervention; reframes treatment as abuse tactic
Risk Level:
Notes: Undermines professional medical support; may endanger children by discrediting therapeutic care.
Quote 120 (Page 35, Line 5)
Quote: “Spiritually, I—this is my freedom of speech, Your Honor. I’m allowed to speak about when I see evil in a person’s eyes.”
NLP Pattern: Spiritual Framing / Free Speech Claim
Psychological Effect: Elevates speech to protected status while evoking religious righteousness
Risk Level:
Notes: Spiritual justification used to defend defamatory or accusatory content as moral obligation.
Quote 121 (Page 36, Line 1)
Quote: “As a Christian, to speak about evil and to do prayer ceremonies and prayer vigils and to talk about evil. It’s my life as a spiritual being, as a Christian.”
NLP Pattern: Spiritual Identity / Justification
Psychological Effect: Asserts religious conviction to validate controversial or accusatory speech
Risk Level:
Notes: Uses spiritual framework as a rhetorical shield for inflammatory or polarizing views; reinforces perceived immunity from critique.
Quote 122 (Page 36, Line 3)
Quote: “It has nothing — again, it has nothing to do with my money or my work or anything related to my probation.”
NLP Pattern: Separation Claim / Probation Boundary
Psychological Effect: Attempts to draw clear lines between public behavior and legal oversight to evade consequences
Risk Level:
Notes: Strategic distancing tactic; denies overlap between advocacy, business, and legal restrictions despite behavioral overlap.
Quote 123 (Page 36, Line 4)
Quote: “That is my spiritual path — to believe in Jesus and to believe that when I see evil, when I see in the eyes of a person that has abused a child — because I believe the child, I believe women…”
NLP Pattern: Religious Framing / Victim Belief Statement
Psychological Effect: Equates moral perception with spiritual authority, bypassing factual evaluation
Risk Level:
Notes: Combines religious belief with moral certainty, reinforcing emotionally-driven accusations as truth.
Quote 124 (Page 36, Line 6)
Quote: “…it is less than one — this is another statistic from the Department of Justice statistics — less than 1 percent of children have been found to be making up false allegations…”
NLP Pattern: DOJ Statistic Claim / Justification
Psychological Effect: Uses institutional credibility to validate belief in accusations, discouraging skepticism
Risk Level:
Notes: Likely simplified or selectively cited; may be used to suppress scrutiny or contradict contradictory evidence.
Quote 125 (Page 36, Line 8)
Quote: “…and less than 13 percent of mothers have been found to be leaving false allegations.”
NLP Pattern: Motherhood Defense / Statistical Justification
Psychological Effect: Reinforces gender-based trustworthiness to support emotional appeals and collective innocence
Risk Level:
Notes: Extends moral presumption of honesty to mothers broadly, regardless of case specifics or legal findings.
Quote 126 (Page 36, Line 9)
Quote: “So the odds are in the favor of these mothers and these children by a long shot.”
NLP Pattern: Probability Framing / Defense
Psychological Effect: Positions collective statistics as proof of specific truth; suppresses case-by-case critical thinking
Risk Level:
Notes: Generalized risk-reduction statement weaponized to frame dissent or legal inquiry as injustice.
Disclaimer:This document is an AI-assisted legal and psychological analysis based on public court transcripts. All quotes are verbatim and attributed to Liane Wilson (aka Liana Shanti) as recorded in her April 24, 2023 hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00105-SOM). Legal assessments are based on relevant federal and Hawaii state statutes, and psychological patterns are analyzed using frameworks including the Milton Model, Lifton’s Thought Reform Criteria, and Steven Hassan’s BITE Model. The statements presented have not been independently verified, and no corroborating evidence has been provided to support the accuracy or truthfulness of the remarks. This document is not legal advice, and all individuals mentioned are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. The analytical findings herein are provided for educational, investigative, and public safety purposes.